Panko Press, 2009 Season Summary
|

Click for 2009 PG videos |
Summary:
After a
very slow September,
the PGs show up and steal the
show!
CH are above average and ML at their 20
year average.
OS and NH numbers are below average,
but nowhere as low as the SS & AK
numbers.
Both SS & AK numbers are so low as to be
very worrisome and worthy of further study
on their breeding grounds.
|
2009
Compared to the 20-yr Average
|
|
2009 Total |
20 YR AVG |
Deviation fr 20-yr ave |
|
OS |
264 |
305 |
-16% |
|
BE |
1 |
3 |
**** |
|
NH |
181 |
230 |
-21% |
|
SS |
291 |
455 |
-36% |
|
CH |
47 |
28 |
+70% |
|
NG |
1 |
2 |
**** |
|
RS |
0 |
0 |
**** |
|
BW |
0 |
0 |
**** |
|
RT |
1 |
1 |
**** |
|
RL |
0 |
0 |
**** |
|
AK |
518 |
1360 |
-62% |
|
ML |
1291 |
1291 |
+0.0% |
|
PG |
290 |
180 |
61% |
|
U |
8 |
22 |
**** |
|
TOT |
2893 |
3876 |
-25% |
|
Hrs |
414 |
432 |
-4.2% |
|
Days |
64 |
61 |
+5.0% |
The last column is the deviation from our
20-year average, for the most common species.
|
The negative deviations for OS & NH
are in the range of normal variation,
and if the
NH are cyclic in numbers, they were
due for a low this year. The positive
variation
for CHs is actually a little lower
than in recent years. In a
statistical fluke the MLs
exactly hit their 20 year average.
The PGs numbers are very significant
and
positive, it seems that they had a
good breeding year - global warming in
the Arctic?
We've had 3 really good years of PG
flights....hopefully they'll continue!
But the AKs and SSs are in
serious trouble in our source
regions. We had a huge drop
in AK numbers in '95 (see
Falcon Trends), then they
seemed to be stabilizing in the
last 5 years, but this year
their numbers have declined to
an all time 28 year low! The SS
numbers have been declining
steadily for years but this year
is a significant drop from
recent years and 36% below their
20 year average. However,
there were 2 days late in the
season, as the adults came
through, that were better than
we could expect considering the
low numbers of immatures.
|
 |
| |
American Kestrel
(video) |
******************
It is often said that one of the
purposes of hawk watching is to
provide early warning of any
worrisome decline in raptor
numbers. What is left out is that
someone has to be listening.
The AKs
certainly, and likely the SSs as
well, need to be promoted to
threatened status.
And serious work must be undertaken
to determine the "Whys & Wherefores"
of their declines.
******************
The low numbers of total hawks (TH)
merely reflects the low AKs & SSs.
The good coverage in both hours and
days covered speaks well of our
wonderful
cadre of volunteers!
|
See you at the beach
next year!
|
|
|
|
Panko Press,
10/12/09 edition

Click for new PG videos |
Summary:
After a
very slow September,
the PGs show up and steal the
show!
CH and ML
are also above average.
OS and NH numbers are below average,
but nowhere as low as the SS & AK
numbers.
Both SS & AK numbers are so low as to be
very worrisome and worthy of further study
on their breeding grounds. |
Notable
days to date(10/10/09):
|
|
9/30 |
10/4 |
10/5 |
10/7 |
10/8 |
10/10 |
10/11 |
YTD |
Dev fr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25YrAve |
|
OS |
9 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
7 |
19 |
4 |
225 |
-16% |
|
BE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
avg:1.9 |
|
NH |
3 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
11 |
9 |
4 |
94 |
-37% |
|
SS |
1 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
17 |
1 |
0 |
84 |
-72% |
|
CH |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
13 |
+26% |
|
NG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
RS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
BW |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
RT |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
RL |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
AK |
2 |
1 |
45 |
0 |
29 |
20 |
12 |
411 |
-72% |
|
ML |
64 |
10 |
101 |
4 |
91 |
162 |
6 |
1067 |
+8.5% |
|
PG |
14 |
25 |
35 |
22 |
7 |
65 |
14 |
229 |
97% |
|
U |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
|
|
TOT |
92 |
38 |
200 |
27 |
166 |
277 |
40 |
2125 |
-45% |
(numbers are
tentative until final reports are submitted)
The last column is the deviation from our
26-year average, for the most common species.
|
|
The negative deviations for OS & NH are
in the range of normal variation, and if
the NH are cyclic in numbers, they were
due for a low this year. The positive
variation for CHs is actually a little
lower than in recent years. The
positive deviation for MLs is
insignificant - well within normal
variation. The PGs numbers are very
significant and positive, it seems that
they had a good breeding year - global
warming in the Arctic?
|
|
 |
|
Peregrine Falcon at FIRE, along the north
shore |
|
But the AKs and SSs are in serious
trouble in our source regions. We had a
huge
drop in AK numbers in '95 (see
http://www.battaly.com/fire/trends/)
but then they seem to be stabilizing in
the last 5 years, but this year their
numbers have declined significantly
again! The SS numbers have been
declining steadily for years but this
year is a significant drop from normal.
However, there is a chance that the
numbers may pick up as the adults start
coming through....but I'm not betting on
it.
|
|
It is often said that one of the
purposes of hawkwatching is to provide
early warning
of any worrisome decline in raptor
numbers. What is left out is that
someone has to be listening. The AKs
certainly, and likely the SSs as well,
need to be promoted to threatened
status. And serious work must be
undertaken to determine the "Whys &
Wherefores" of their declines.
The low numbers of total hawks (TH)
merely reflects the low AKs & SSs.
Hope to see you all down at the beach!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary:
It's been a
very slow September.
CH is
the only species above average.
OS, ML
and PG numbers are at or close to average.
And all other species are well below average -
AKs being most worrisome.
Notable
days to date(9/30/09):
|
|
|
8/31 |
9/9 |
9/15 |
9/19 |
9/25 |
9/30 |
YTD |
Dev fr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25YrAve |
|
OS |
17 |
18 |
5 |
21 |
45 |
9 |
180 |
-8% |
|
BE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
avg:0.8 |
|
NH |
2 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
28 |
3 |
54 |
-41% |
|
SS |
0 |
1 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
1 |
60 |
-61% |
|
CH |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
+16% |
|
NG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
RS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
BW |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
RT |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
RL |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
AK |
0 |
3 |
1 |
71 |
184 |
2 |
294 |
-69% |
|
ML |
1 |
48 |
81 |
50 |
159 |
64 |
617 |
-10% |
|
PG |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
14 |
45 |
0% |
|
U |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
|
|
TOT |
21 |
73 |
94 |
161 |
442 |
92 |
1264 |
-45% |
|
(numbers are
tentative until final reports are submitted)
The last column is the deviation from our
25-year average, for the most common species.
|
This year seems to be
starting off very low. The AKs, NHs and SSs
are well below our 26 year average. I am
really worried about the AKs. They seemed
to stabilize in the last 3 years but this is
a significant decline from their average
over the last 3 years. The SS numbers are
very low - but consistent with their average
over the last 13 years. The NH are very
low, but they seem to cycle every 5 or 6
years and they were due to be low this year.
The low numbers of total hawks (TH) merely
reflects the low AKs & SSs. |
 |
| |
Osprey at FIRE,
Sep 15, 2009 |
|
Thank goodness for the near average
numbers of OS, ML, and PGs or we would
have nothing to count!
Be on the lookout for the next cold
front - Sunday or Monday. We're in
Peregrine season!
|
|
|
|